Another month shuffles, like Fred Thompson, off into its deserved oblivion. I see no overarching theme. I sense nothing momentous in the Zeitgeist except the possible implosion of the Clintons and the deepening irrelevance of the Bushes. And the oft-heralded Decline of the American Empire. It might be for real this time.
Nothing much of deep moment in the world of our favorite juice. "Business sucks," etc., etc.
So I offer a series of random thoughts, quips, japes, apercus and whatnot.
Presidential politics
Obama vs. McCain -- two roses.
Clinton vs. Romney -- two dung heaps.
Blogger down!
My good friend and pre-eminent Italian wine blogger, Giampiero Nadali, is leaving the hospital after suffering a severe attack of angina. Giampi is 47, the age I was when I suffered the Big One. And lo! I lived to sin again.
I hope he recovers fast, gets more exercise, eats less Camembert, and keeps on tasting and writing.
Recession-proof Italian wine?
Alfonso Cevola told me that December ended up strong where he works -- Italian wine ended on the up side in sales volume and value as wines of other provenance fell off. Like everyone, Alfonso has expressed caution if not outright pessimism about the year ahead. Even so, retail trends and research predictions indicate a better-than-average ride for vino italiano in America.
Picturesque interlude
But not all Italian wine will prosper
Even big spenders cut back in a recession. I hear that the Brunello tasting on Tuesday drew a large and enthusiastic crowd. (I didn't go because I actually had things to do.) Brunello is lovely stuff, cheaper than Barolo and supertuscans, and drinkable at more dining occasions. Rounder and, in my opinion, more balanced than most Chiantis, too.
People are still saying they're fascinated with the South and its local grapes. The price points are usually very attractive as well.
Meanwhile, out west
I feel like a matchmaker. Thanks to the Six Degrees phenomenon, I have managed to get two San Diegans together to talk about wine and the universe and so on. Jeremy Parzen and Robin Stark, both recently featured on these hallowed virtual pages, are having lunch today. Truly a meeting of the adorable and the adorable.
What's with Stumbleupon?
Lately I've had hundreds of visitors a day come via Stumbleupon. What was posted as being so all-fired compelling? Why do they come? I hope it's for something besides that old Liev Schreiber picture -- nice if it were because of a wine article, though I doubt it.
Yeah, I'm scraping the bottom of the topic barrel today. I should quit procrastinating and pack for today's flight to Nice and thence to northern Italy, from Piemonte all the way over to the Slovenian border in Friuli. A tour of select wee vineyards in several regions. May the Blackberry work as advertised and promised by Verizon.
Oh, one more mildly amusing thing...
Continue reading "The end-of-the-month what-have-we-learned blues wrapup" »



















Modern wine tasting and other deplorable activities
Someone reminded yesterday of a wonderful critique of the modern system of wine tasting and evaluation. I hadn't read it for a long time, and it was refreshing to check it out again today. It is Joe Dressner's astute take on the whole analytical approach to wine evaluation. He published it in 2005, and I must quote a passage that struck me as especially good:
How boring the world of Points/Tasting notes has become! I even see my friends, people I like, writing endless tasting notes with endless useless fruit/wood/earth analogies that are of no possible use to anyone. Yes, they drop off the points, but they are still using the same methodology. Furthermore, modern oenology has learned how to manipulate wine to create manufactured aromas and flavors that fit into the "tasting palates" artificial construct.
Has anyone besides me noticed that the methodology Joe criticizes is exactly parallel to the New Criticism in literature? This misguided movement sprang up in the 1940s as an effort to be less subjective and impressionistic in evaluating a poem or novel or, I suppose, the copy on a box of Rice Krispies. The injunction was to consider only what is in the text, as if the sacred Text in question had been dropped from above by Neoplatonic angels. Forbidden was consideration of cultural, personal, economic, political, etc., etc., factors which may have contributed to the conception and development of the text.
Fake scientism. In litteras, in vino.
Let's leave all that behind. Please.
Allegedly Joe Dressner
Posted on January 31, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (9) | TrackBack (0)